

In order to find the roots of improvisation, the communicative act that has infused music since its earliest inception, it is necessary to look beyond the tempered scale and bandstand practices to non-tempered and ritualistic practices that imbue those most ‘basic’ ways of making music. To be sure, there are several ways in which non-western source material have found their way into contemporary improvisation. As a spiritual communion, a celebratory act of reverence and worship of sound run through the mill of jazz and western classical music as well as China, India, Japan, Turkey and points in between, ‘ethnic improvisation’ has informed the Sea Ensemble and Don Cherry’s Organic Music Society, among others. Of a more direct approach, and conceived to gain both a more diverse palette and a constancy of new playing situations, the use of an entire catalog of non-western and homemade instruments has informed the work of composers like Mauricio Kagel and the improvisation group New Phonic Art (Michel Portal, Vinko Globokar, Carlos Roqué Alsina, Jean-Pierre Drouet).
Somewhere in between reverence and a knotty neo-dadaist approach to process lies the duo of Clive Bell and Sylvia Hallett. Hallett, a regular fixture in the London Improvisers’ Orchestra as a violinist (see Bagatellen for a review of the LIO’s latest), has worked since the mid-1970s with many of England’s most vanguard improvisers, a tireless explorer of high harmonics and lengthy bowed tones: violin, viola, cello, sarangi, bowed bicycle wheels, saws, electronically-produced sounds and voice have all entered into her lexicon. Bell, primarily a shakuhachi player (he studied the instrument in Tokyo) and a collector of Asian mouth instruments, has worked in the LIO as well as with the BBC Symphony; The Geographers is their first recorded duo. Something one has to keep in mind when listening to Hallett and Bell (or any of the above mentioned ensembles) is inherent in the title of The Geographers: making an aesthetic, creative map of the world does, on many occasions, require cultural juxtaposition. Such a concept is part and parcel of this music – as in New Phonic Art, where it is highly doubtful that any other musical situation could employ zurna, alphorn, pipe organ and tabla in a quartet improvisation, so Cretan pipes, electronics and bowed bicycle spokes probably have not met before this duo. Luckily, The Geographers appears as a balance between reverent and post-structural juxtaposition, humming electronics and high harmonics from Hallett’s arsenal girding and filling out the traditionally-played, plaintive and full-bodied sound of Bell’s various pipes and flutes. “Shrugging into Spring” opens with percussion and dissonant reed cries from Bell’s pi saw (a Thai free reed instrument) before segueing into an intense bout of shakuhachi and viola, a slowly building overture of disparates. Sarangi and shakuhachi are employed for “Flying on the Landing,” an exploration of controlled violence, Bell’s shakuhachi given a pinched, terse vocabulary to mate with the sarangi’s 35 tuned blades. The khene, a Chinese harmonica, is given a hymnal workout (indeed, as an instrument, it has a processional quality) to an underpinning of bowed bicycle spokes in “With the Book Propped Up Against the Horse’s Mane.” To be sure, there is a foray into wispy bent notes and wide vibratos commingling, saw and breath in “The Weald,” the thirteen-minute centerpiece in which Bell’s shakuhachi takes on a distinctly bowed, shrill character, a thicker grade of metal to match Hallett’s saw.
Juxtapositions, while undeniably present, are often subtle and, as Bell and Hallett are well aware of the potential of both instrumentation and listening ability, ironic commentary is quashed by the complementary beauty that each is able to bring from their vocabulary. With The Geographers, Clive Bell and Sylvia Hallett have created a rather visceral meditation on sound – leaving one to wonder whether the originators of musical communication had such power in mind.
Posted by clifford on June 26, 2005 8:12 PMCould you explain why there are those links to MP3.com on the word "music" above, Clifford? I enjoyed this album quite a bit. Now wondering what Clive will sound like with +minus (Bernhard Günter hinted at such a collaboration recently). Any news on that Brian (Marley)? And, hey, whatever happened to that BOOK?!
Posted by: Dan Warburton at June 26, 2005 10:29 PMI enjoyed this album much more than a bit - in fact, I think it's an out-and-out gem.
And you raise a number of valuable points in your review, Clifford (for which, many thanks). I'll be sure to nick the best bits when I review this CD for The Wire.
Now, Dan, as for the book, Mark will be putting it into production within the next few weeks. You won't have to hold your breath much longer.
Posted by: Brian Marley at June 27, 2005 2:52 AMMan, those links annoy the fuck out of me and I have no idea why they're there. I had a bunch of spyware on my computer last week that has since been cleaned, but I'm wondering if it sabotaged my article...
Sorry about that!
Glad the non-linked text hits some spots for everyone, though.
Posted by: clifford at June 27, 2005 8:01 AMAhh, thangod those stupid links are gone. Er, thank Derek I mean.
Posted by: clifford at June 28, 2005 11:20 AMWasn't me, maybe Emory?
Spyware is some spooky shit.
Posted by: derek at June 28, 2005 3:40 PMIs it not a bit "New Age"? Not heard the album, but every time I've seen that pair play live round London they've played a few too many cosmic, goshgollywow wide-eyed-at-the-world drones. And when that's accompanied by cretan pipes and shakuhachi... Reminded me too much of the turgid, patronising noises produced by Sami Abadi at the LEM festival in Barcelona last year (though B&H are much better than that, granted).
Posted by: matt at June 30, 2005 7:53 AMit´s not easy to see one´s work flattered by a subjective comment and a couple of adjectives. but it´s part of the game, i guess...
at least, I would like to say that there´s nothing "patronizing" in my music (maybe the listener didn´t like the fact that i spoke to the audience, instead of playing the game of the `untouchable & distant artist´?
and is my music "turgid"? (what does it mean?) i am not trying to please anybody, i follow my own visions instead. but i don´t search for provocation in itself neither. i am an experimental artist -i guess-, but to work with integrity also means for me to stay true to the sound that moves my own sensibility. harsh at times, reflective other times. futuristic and unheard as much as respectfully evocative of the cultures i´ve studied.
in any case, you can check my work and build your own opinion:
www.samiabadi.com.ar
www.musicaexperimental.com.ar
as well as my CD´s:
"Lejos o Leve?"
"Lunar"
and the forthcoming
"Amphibians School of Flight"
thank you so much,
sami abadi -from Buenos Aires, Argentina-
.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................