

RAR
Over recent years there have been a good few attempts to combine the musical vocabularies of EAI and modern noise music. Whilst at first they may seem to have quite a bit in common; similar uses of electronics, some crossover in audiences, there are also fundamental differences between the two genres that have lead to the failure of the majority of attempts at fusion.
If an over-arching statement can possibly be made about the vague area of music known as EAI it is that careful attention is paid to the choice and placement of the sounds used. Decisions made about what not to play are also often as important as the reverse. Contemporary noise music on the other hand mainly utilises the adrenalin created from the steady growth of volume and intensity as its central theme. Whilst many of the sounds used in each style of playing may be related, the way they are used is usually very different.
Intaglio, the debut release by Tandem Electrics, a young New York duo of Richard Kamerman (amplified laptop circuits) and Reed Evan Rosenberg (programming) utilises elements of both genres to create music that goes some way to successfully finding some common ground. If the truth be told though the attention to form and space more prevalent in EAI rather than the sheer physicality of noise wins through on this release.
Whilst Rosenberg can often be found performing in harsh noise collaborations and Kamerman is no stranger to loud music, volume never becomes a key factor in this music. The sounds involved lean heavily towards a cement-mixer ugliness. Rough electronic splatter and dirty splurges often revolving in small loops form much of the raw material, yet despite these rough qualities they are not allowed to slip into droning layers. There is a control and precision to this recording that lets the music breathe, and allows the interplay between the musicians to take front stage, a feature often less obvious in the car-crash pile-ups of noise music collaborations.
I use the word carefully, not wishing to cast aside the energy rush of noise as merely the output of a modern youth, but there is a real sense of maturity to Intaglio, a strong focus on the overall composition and how each moment contributes to the whole. At the same time the music retains an edge, threatening to tip over it on several occasions but never succeeding. On my first listen my hand regularly hovered over the volume dial preparing to protect myself from the wrath of my neighbours, but such action is never necessary and the tension is admirably left to brood rather than explode into an obvious release.
Intaglio isn’t easy on the ears, the rough edges of the raw materials used can be tough going. Kamerman’s amplifications of the internal workings of a laptop and Rosenberg’s digital squall aren’t the most inviting of sounds, often severe and jarring, the sound of modern electronics we aren’t meant to hear. Whilst it is not uncommon for me to enjoy music that utilises a limited palette of sounds I cannot help but feel that a wider range here would bring an additional warmth and colour that would benefit the music overall. I’d like to hear the duo play with a third, perhaps even acoustic musician too to extend the depth of the sound even further. For now though Intaglio is a strong release from two very promising musicians.
Rosenberg MySpace
Kamerman MySpace
So which side of the fence are you going put Peter Rehberg on, Richard?
Posted by: Dan Warburton at February 13, 2008 10:29 PMNot sure exactly what you mean Dan. If you are just asking if he makes noise music or EAI then I'd say obviously both, varying from project to project. I certainly prefer his occasional quieter improv to anything else he does though.
His disc with Schmickler is another good example of finding a meeting point between EAI and noise actually, though it approaches the problem quite differently to the Tandem Electrics disc.
Posted by: Richard Pinnell at February 14, 2008 1:26 AMPlease stop using "whilst" so much.
Posted by: Tory Dirk at February 14, 2008 8:06 AMPlease stop using "whilst" so much.
Posted by: Tory Dirk at February 14, 2008 8:06 AMRichard is from the UK, he can use whilst all he wants. I really enjoyed R/S, personally.
Posted by: damon Smith at February 14, 2008 8:18 AMMy point was where to draw the line between noise and EAI (old debate) - does a noisy (for the most part) EAI outing like R/S count as one or the other? I'd say it was EAI myself because the musicians know what they're doing, which I don't always imagine is the case with noise (though I know this is inviting a shitstorm of protest from the noiseniks)..
And where do we file Kevin Drumm?
My main categories are:
1. Did I listen to it more than once?
2. Did it affect my own music in a clear an obvious way?
I give R/S a yes on both counts. Timing was part of that, I was just starting to work with the laptop in my music when I got it.
To address your question more, I would say the "I" in EAI is the determining factor.
Does it go to the shitstorm collectively? Or is it just one bozo burying everyone?
If it is just one, how long do they do it for? Do the others get space at other points in the piece for their ideal dynamic? I think is those sort of issues that push it toward one camp or the other.
don't you guys "cue in line" as opposed to simply line up? ;)
Posted by: Tom Sekowski at February 14, 2008 11:21 AMIndeed I am English Tory kind Sir, and the use of the word "whilst" is perfectly acceptable on these shores. Being named "Tory" is however less acceptable around here...! ;)
and Tom, no we don't "cue in line" we "wait in a queue" ;)
I can't find it right now, but somewhere online there's an English to American translator site.
Posted by: Richard Pinnell at February 14, 2008 9:55 PMPardon me good Sir Richard - I meant queue of course, not cue....my apologies...
Posted by: Tom Sekowski at February 15, 2008 5:58 AMDan, did the Tandem Electrics guys send you a copy to review as well? I wonder where this fits in terms of quality and perceived self-awareness on that noise:eai continuum to your ears.
Posted by: david at February 15, 2008 10:57 AMI think we can make a distinction b/t noisy EAI and Noise (capital "N") by using Keith Rowe's explaination of why Sonic Youth can't play Avant-Garde music from the Wire.
With EAI there is an attention to the detail of the phrase (whether quiet, noisy, sparse or dense) that is lacking in Noise music.
With Noise the attention is more on gross gestures.
Of course, there is still grey area, but that seems to make sense to me, and is the same reason I would categorize Oren Ambarchi's solo on Southern Lord as EAI, rather than pop music (or the SSSD cd on Grob as EAI rather than new age, etc.)
If this seems too complicated then you can use these simple 2 steps as deciding criteria:
1) If they are wearing costumes and/or have compound nonsensical names then they are Noise.
2) If they have a recording on Erstwhile then they are EAI.
No, David, haven't heard this. Thanks Jacob for the comments (even the more tongue-in-cheek ones); you have a point about phrasing, yes.
New Age? Euurch, we had that discussion over at IHM. Not opening that can o' worms again.
"If this seems too complicated then you can use these simple 2 steps as deciding criteria:
1) If they are wearing costumes and/or have compound nonsensical names then they are Noise."
- You mean like TV Pow?
"2) If they have a recording on Erstwhile then they are EAI."
- You mean like TV Pow?
Posted by: Joe at February 17, 2008 12:18 AMRichard, thanks for the review. I don't know if it's really proper protocol for a musician to post a comment on a review of his own album here but I just want to address one quick point.
"I’d like to hear the duo play with a third, perhaps even acoustic musician too to extend the depth of the sound even further."
I can't predict if expanding to a trio with an acoustic musician will ever happen but there is a recording available at the netlabel Noise-Joy of Reed and myself playing a set with Billy Gomberg and using a somewhat broader palette of sounds than ultimately became the limits of Tandem Electrics. It's not as strong as Intaglio but it's quite good I think too.
http://www.noise-joy.org/artists/gombergkamermanrosenberg.html
And Dan, I wasn't in charge of mailing out discs but I'll make sure one gets sent to you now!
Posted by: Richard Kamerman at February 20, 2008 9:18 AMThanks Richard, for that and the link above. And there's no reason why you shouldn't comment on your own work, or a review of it. In this area of business there aren't always enough people around to blow your trumpet, so go ahead and blow it yourself.
Posted by: Dan Warburton at February 20, 2008 10:26 AMNot even the English (most of whom prefer the infinitely more common "while") would find the need to use the word "whilst" about half a dozen times in such a short piece; and those all in the same form, namely, at the beginning of a sentence.
Whilst I'm not kept awake by this, generally I think it has the effect, intended or unintended, of sounding snooty--by dint of it being archaic, as is "amongst" for among--and that it would benefit by becoming as modernised as the music under scrutiny.
Posted by: Susan Emery at February 25, 2008 3:36 PMzackly
Posted by: Tory Dirk at February 25, 2008 4:36 PMTried posting a more literate version of this post last week but it didn't take--Good recording! One of the better things I've heard this young year.
Posted by: Brian Olewnick at February 26, 2008 5:28 AMSusan, Tory, whilst I appreciate you may not like my turn of phrase it is perfectly natural to me, the way I speak every day and I have no intention of changing it, sorry! Personally I don't think I have a snooty bone in my body, but you are of course entitled to your opinion.
I do think it would be more interesting to discuss the music in question rather than pass comment on the number of times a particular word lies amongst the body of text however :)
Posted by: Richard Pinnell at February 26, 2008 9:09 AMJust a word to thank you Reed for fwding the disc, which arrived yesterday. Looking forward to a good listen this weekend.
Posted by: Dan Warburton at March 14, 2008 1:01 AM"Whilst" is great. My own all-time favourite is "Whereas". In an entire lifetime, I don't think I've ever heard an American use it.
Posted by: Graham L. Rogers at March 16, 2008 1:44 PMAh, welcome back Graham. Been on sabbatical, have you?!
Posted by: Dan Warburton at March 17, 2008 2:21 AMDan:
I've intermittently been here all along, whilst on my daily searches of the net for good sounds, and whereas the occasional temptation did indeed raise its head, the heart ultimately could not abandon dear Bags.
Posted by: Graham L. Rogers at March 17, 2008 11:07 AM.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................