

l’Innomable
Admittedly, I find it somehow refreshing on its own merits to hear a good, new recording that’s entirely composed on non-electronic sounds. Nothing at all, of course, against current-driven noises but it’s always a good thing, even if only as a listener, to be able to step out of a given stream and stand momentarily on the shore, taking in the surroundings from a slightly different vantage. A relatively minor concern anyway; it’s the musicians themselves who make the difference whether plying their art with computers or sticks ‘n’ stones. Here, Dörner eschews his laptop, sticking to trumpet while Capece, too, abandons any electronica, summoning air through soprano saxophone and bass clarinet.
Two long, untitled improvisations. The first spends most of its first half in breath-tone territory before shifting into long, held notes of varying purity or granularity. But it’s less about the nature of the sounds themselves than their paired spacing, the gentle dovetailing and spatial undulations that occur. The pacing is calm, considered. Care seems to be taken to contrast the sounds effectively, allowing space for each while still, more often than not, weaving a strand that can be heard as a whole. The remaining track is only marginally different, the tones again tending toward the drawn out, the textures tumbling from sputtering air columns to burbles to dark hums. Near the beginning, Capece engages in some playing that sounds rather electronic, in fact. But again, it’s all about the spatial dance of the two lines, the silences between and the relationships found among the tones. The disc is very “unspectacular” to that extent, almost demure, but all the richer for that.
A very good recording.
Posted by Brian Olewnick on April 17, 2007 5:13 PMThis is one of the best things I've heard from Dorner in eons. Wonderful stuff!
I agree with Tom and Brian; this is a really fine CD (except the little paintings on the cover; until now l'innomable's covers have been excellent. What's happened? But then what the hell does the cover matter if the music's as good as this...?)
Like Brian I too am rather pleased to hear both players being purely acoustic. I like lots of electronic improvisation, but when I hear really fine acoustic playing I find it even more engaging. Does this make me an old fogey?
Fwiw I find the first piece particularly strong.
Posted by: simon r at April 18, 2007 2:27 PM''I agree with Tom and Brian; this is a really fine CD (except the little paintings on the cover; until now l'innomable's covers have been excellent. What's happened?''
Well normally all of our cds are designed by other half of the label Jani Peternelj. This one was coop w musicians who wanted Emilio's paintings on the cd sleeves which are fine by us. Jani then desinged overall slevve including these two pictures. I like them- the cd looks like cd w music for children:)
Posted by: lukaz at April 19, 2007 4:57 AMI agree with Lukaz - the CD looks like one of many audio fairy tales that my kids have sitting on their shelves. It's actually quite a nice change from the usual gloom'n'doom concept that much of this music features as covers.
Posted by: Tom Sekowski at April 19, 2007 5:06 AMMy peepers aren't what they used to be... is that a beached pink whale with a parasol protruding from its blowhole?
Posted by: Juko Mekuria at April 19, 2007 5:35 AMIt's not a parasol but a swimmer making a great leap right over the whale. I love that painting.
Posted by: Tom Sekowski at April 19, 2007 1:35 PM.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................