(Various) Idroscalo d'Autore - Disco Compatto Numero Uno

(Various) Idroscalo d’Autore
Disco Compatto Numero Uno
Idroscalo


Pity the poor reviewer. Not only is he deluged with odd and difficult music from around the globe in innumerable styles and expected to be able to digest it all. No, that’s too easy. There have to exist labels who take a further step, releasing their product shrouded within an even more impenetrable umbra, giving out scant or conflicting information as to what you’re actually hearing. Does it matter? Not too much, all things considered; you still hear sounds and react to them. But it makes writing about the stuff just that much more of a thistle-infested undertaking.

Thistles. Not so bad an image for many of the tracks collected here in, though their thorniness is often counterbalanced by a degree of rhythm and, almost catchiness. Who’s responsible for a given piece, on the other hand, is open to question. Thirteen pieces by thirteen different individuals or groups, selections of relatively short duration (2-7 minutes) with a strong leaning toward the accessibly gnarly. The CD booklet lists the perpetrators in quasi-alpha order as follows: Anofele, Anton Nikkila, Domenico Sciajno, David Karpenter, Fabio Gionfrida, Kar, Justin Bennett, Mas, Maurizio Martusciallo, Nihil, Noitz, Resina and Tirriddiliu. Ah, thinks I, maybe this is the track order. But then I spy tiny script on the back of the CD following this roster: “this list is not the track list”. OK. Sciajno’s was the only name to register initially, though I subsequently learned that I had heard several others in various contexts. Not that this mattered. Could I mail the label and ask? Sure, but it seems to me that one should accept the presentation as offered. Besides, I imagine readers here in the know will quickly fill in the many gaps.

Of course, it wouldn’t be worth going through all this foofaraw if the music contained wasn’t good; and, by and large, it is. I’ll admit that, had it been presented as the work of a single musician or group, I don’t think I would have raised an eyebrow. There is something of a kindred strain at play in the pieces—all electronic, all fairly noise-oriented though with at least a passing glance here and there to rhythms and melodies. There’s not really a weak track around and several of the pieces are quite fine, beginning with the opening rumble, a cavernous, quietly volcanic work on through the equally mysterious and fascinating third track, continuing past the burbling, cantankerous fourth cut with its massive drones and inklings of industrial rhythms. Track ten, beginning with street recordings of a young child counting (in Italian, I think?) and progressing through a fractured soundscape of crowd noise, what sound like barely-registering-through-static trumpet bleats and other horn-like blares is my pick of this anonymous litter. The sheer welter of noise that’s eventually thrown up is as overwhelming as it is ecstatic. The twelfth cut is also very impressive, brooding and dead serious, soon generating a sputtering rhythm, vague, kora-like pluckings and an urgent whine. The final piece ushers things out with a steady, near dance beat, maybe causing one to think of an updating of the better, African-influenced Laswell or Hector Zazou/Bony Bikaye works from the 80s.

Whoever’s responsible for which pieces, this “No. 1 CD” is good listening.

Posted by Brian Olewnick on September 21, 2005 7:27 AM
Comments

I sympathise with you entirely, Brian. I found this one rather confusing. Music's quite nice but I didn't know what to say about it. By and large I like getting compilations but hate reviewing them (not enough time & space to namecheck everyone, and people invariably write in to complain if they're left out). I remember being hauled over the coals by Jason Lescalleet for hardly mentioning his contribution to the Intransitive Variious set a few years ago (and he was right to do so). Anyone else out there feel the same way about compilations?

Posted by: Dan Warburton at September 21, 2005 10:10 PM

Yeah. I like hearing them, I didn't like having to review them.

Posted by: walto at September 22, 2005 6:24 AM

I'm sick of writing reviews, period. Somebody give me some inspiration! Where is there ANY music really to get excited about enough to pen stanzas of praise? Tell me the game's worth the candle (whatever that means).

Posted by: djll at September 22, 2005 12:00 PM

There's plenty of great music around, but why that should make one want to review them is mysterious to me. Anyhow, I don't at all get the desire to review being equal to the desire to pen stanzas of praise.

For me, it's simple, it was fun listening (much of the time), but a pain in the ass reviewing (almost always)....so I stopped.

Posted by: walto at September 23, 2005 3:51 AM

I dunno, isn't it a bit of a noble gesture to try to draw attention to valuable & possibly neglected music?

Posted by: ND at September 23, 2005 2:54 PM

No need to worry, Nate. There's plenty of nobility around. In the last STN, for example, except for a couple of lukewarm reviews by JBiv (for which, many thanks, Prof!) absolutely brilliant music and the vast nobility of critics is apparent in every single corner.

Posted by: walto at September 24, 2005 6:25 AM

Lukewarm is the new bilious.

Posted by: Jason at September 24, 2005 7:55 AM


Post a comment










Remember personal info?




Please enter the letter "x" in the field below:

NOTE: there will be some lag after you hit the "submit" button, but not much. That lag is our badass spam deterrent software at work. It is not necessary to use the submit button more than once. Thank you.



.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................