Two from For 4 Ears

eRikm/Gunter Muller/Toshimaru Nakamura
Why Not Béchamel
For 4 Ears
CD 1553

Jason Kahn/Gunter Muller
Blinks
For 4 Ears
CD 1552

Perennial favorite Gunter Muller returns with two more releases on his fine label, his collaborative prowess featured on each.

The trio on “Why Not Béchamel” (no question mark in the title) is certainly an intriguing one on paper. Despite the near total electronicity of each, their approaches are distinct enough to ensure a wide range of sound. “Keburu” is all dark, ominous undertones split through by blasts of high-pitched static bleats and pops. Not too surprisingly, given the presence of Muller and eRikm (I’m using what is apparently the latest preferred spelling of his nom de musique), rhythmic patterns emerge with some frequency, generally as throbbing pulses or iterated swashes of white noise. It’s an effective mélange; as ply after ply is layered in, spun and twisted you get a rich, physical sound field full of spatiality and color until the plug, or cable, is harshly pulled. “Kabel”, easily the longest track at almost 25 minutes, occupies fairly similar territory but is less intensely claustrophobic and more expansive. There are multitudes of overlapping rhythmic elements sunk into near tonal beds of hum. At one point several minutes in, I swear that for a moment I thought I was hearing a West Indian gospel choir, softly intoning over local percussion. Very strange. This actually develops into a section rather reminiscent of Jon Hassell’s Fourth World music. One of the things I’ve always appreciated about Muller is his ability to just set things on simmer and percolate along, something very much in effect on this piece. A good Muller recording is sometimes like watching a bubbling stew and this one goes excitingly aboil at its conclusion. They close out with a brief nightscape of croaks and cheeps, interrupted by the odd train whistle or shooting star. It’s a good, strong recording, guaranteed to tickle one’s pleasure buds.

Muller’s duo with Jason Kahn (here wielding a Powerbook, no percussion) is different in structure, consisting of nine shortish tracks, but the music touches on the same areas albeit with an increased lucidity perhaps due to having only two sets of hands involved. Again, rhythmic elements abound but instead of the abstract static patches that Nakamura is wont to generate, you hear more bell-like tones and a generally brighter palette. My problems with the disc are twofold: 1) there’s a bit of sameness in approach on the tracks and 2), perhaps contradictorily, I wanted to hear the pieces at greater length instead of the 5-7 minutes allotted. There are plenty of attractive samplings to be found. “Fourth Blink” (all the tracks are titled First through Ninth Blink) opens beguilingly, for instance, with a mysterious aspect that I would have loved to have heard delved into further. Several of the pieces, in fact, end rather abruptly, picking up and leaving just as they’re beginning to cook. Even though I think the duo would be better served by stretching out, it’s an enjoyable disc, one of the finer things I’ve heard from Kahn in a while. Still, the delights offered by “Blinks” have something of a momentary quality to them, for me, while those of “Why Not Béchamel” linger on for a good while longer.


Posted by brian on November 13, 2004 12:12 PM
Comments

I think "Why Not Bechamel" is much better record than "Blinks" (music on the latter one lacks time to develope, to grow, to bloom, etc.), mostly because of its variety, and determination of the musicians to explore sound to the same end. Maybe the variety is caused by the fact that two tracks: "keburu" (does it means "cable" in japanese ?) and "cable" were constructed ("reorganised") by erikm, while "kabel" was created by mueller. erikm's tracks are sharp, dense and somehow noisy, muller's one is soft, even mellow and mellancholic (reminds me of floating water - water in the well, in a big pipe, and at last in the ocean). "Why not bechamel" is not very original or great recording, but it's very enjoyable listening (perfect for autumn).

Posted by: tadk at November 14, 2004 9:54 AM

Very autumnal, yes. Of the two discs the one I ended up listening to most was Blinks. Bechamel is very accomplished stuff, but contains fewer surprises (for me). Kahn is more elusive than you think; it took me a while to get into Songs for Nicholas Ross but now it's one of my favourite albums of the past year.

Posted by: Dan Warburton at November 21, 2004 10:17 PM

There's a further Kahn/Muller track from the Blinks sessions on the latest "Wiretapper" 2CD. It stands out like a beacon in a sea of mediocrity.

Posted by: Alastair at November 22, 2004 6:15 AM

I agree that "Blinks" is a really good record, but now for me "Why not..." is better. Simply there must be something wrong with me - I just prefer longer tracks to get really deep into them.
The same problem I have with "Songs for Nicholas Ross". I like most of the tracks, but I'm not convinced to the record as a whole. For me listening to it is like surfing on tv chanels: interesting, entertaining, but I feel that something's missing; something had been gone before I turned to "the song". And one more problem: (not all of the tracks, but) many of them end so suddenly that I can hardly catch them. (and that's why I prefer, for example, "Miramar").

Posted by: tadk at November 22, 2004 11:26 AM

http://www.paristransatlantic.com/magazine/interviews/kahn.html for more info on Songs. I like the abrupt ends very much - makes a change from the usual eternal wimpy fading out that seems to constitute the end of 99% of music these days.

Posted by: Dan Warburton at November 22, 2004 9:58 PM

Thanks. It was a very interesting reading, I've learned a lot. BTW: in the interview, there are also listed Jason Kahn's forthcoming records. Which of them have been already released (for example, he says that the one with Lescalleet will be out on August - but which year ? I don't think it's already released)

Posted by: tadk at November 24, 2004 3:51 AM

yes, the Kahn/Lescalleet record was released a few weeks ago, it's titled Red Room on Chloë. we have it for sale here:

http://www.erstwhilerecords.com/inventory/list.asp

Posted by: Jon Abbey at November 24, 2004 6:41 AM

this is jason's website: http://jasonkahn.net (the discography is pretty up to date)

i agree with dan on the abrupt endings. for me his way of mixing/editing often reminds me of taking a photograph or looking through the window of train en route: even though you think the landscape always stays the same, if you close your eyes for just one second and look again, everything is different.

Posted by: tomas at November 24, 2004 11:55 AM

"the usual eternal wimpy fading out that seems to constitute the end of 99% of music these days."

FWIW, fading in annoys me more. I don't like a lot of throat clearing before the barn raising begins.

Posted by: walto at November 24, 2004 6:14 PM


Post a comment










Remember personal info?




Please enter the letter "o" in the field below:

NOTE: there will be some lag after you hit the "submit" button, but not much. That lag is our badass spam deterrent software at work. It is not necessary to use the submit button more than once. Thank you.



.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................