Cecil Taylor Quartet - Incarnation

Cecil Taylor Quartet – Incarnation

incarnation.jpg

FMP

One of the rarely mentioned features of the growing treasure chest of Cecil Taylor recordings since the early 80s is that much of the variation in both quality and material on these discs is largely a function of factors that are almost entirely independent of Taylor’s performance. On one outing the sound or balance may not be so good, on another, the bass player may be out of tune or the horn player or marimba work particularly wonderful. Cecil himself, while pretty much always terrific, has, in a manner often lately remarked in connection with Evan Parker, generally played fairly similar material from session to session. He may have a slightly more frenetic or longer climax here or a slightly prettier balladic section (or longer “poetry” section) there, but his approach has generally been pretty consistent. In addition, his range of intervallic and rhythmic choices seems to have narrowed a bit since the seventies. This isn’t meant as criticism, however. Every musician has (or ought to) have a style, and the fact that Parker and Taylor are easily recognizable is thought by many to be factors to be urged in their favor. The point is that since Taylor seems almost always to be inspired by the same divinity (Mars?) and his tremendous energy has not flagged with age, comparisons of his recordings will, to a large extent, focus on the contributions of his sidemen. Those do vary considerably. On Incarnation, Taylor is joined by cellist Tristan Honsinger, electric guitarist Franky Douglas and old friend Andrew Cyrille on percussion (including a set of tympani). Honsinger is very assertive here, from his opening Wild Wild West pizzicato to some Slavic-sounding bowed rhapsodies. As I’ve written elsewhere, assertiveness is particularly important with Taylor sidemen: Cecil will simply trample the diffident in much the same way a stampede of rhinos will squash a couple of worms clinging to in-path underbrush. There's no danger of that with Honsinger. Douglas, on the other hand, does seem a bit cowed occasionally, but when he snaps out of it, his contributions—from “soul” elevenths to “spacey” sound effects—are quite refreshing. He even breaks out his wah-wah pedal at one point. Douglas also spends considerable time clicking away at lower pitches than I believe can be produced on a traditionally tuned electric. This is beneficial to the torque quotient: since Honsinger spends so much of his time scrubbing midrange double-stop tremolos, he can't put in much time on bass substitution duty. (Tristan also fiddles around with some stuff that sounds like it could have been culled from a transcription of L’Histoire du Soldat.) Cyrille provides a somewhat broader palette of timbres here than I’m used to hearing from him. He seems to have made considerable use of his tympani mallets (as well his hands?) in addition to flashing his sticks in his more customary “charge ahead with Cecil” traps style. On this outing, he often seems to focus exclusively on Honsinger: the two regularly provide a tightly in-synch roiling sea for Douglas’s deep bubbles and Taylor’s violently spinning broken propellers. Each player is given considerable space (it’s a 77-minute disc), and each acquits himself quite admirably both in solo and ensemble contexts, though there are several awkward or uncertain moments. In spite of its periods of tremendous intensity, Incarnation also provides generous glimpses of space and warmth and calm—and they are perhaps integrated a bit more gracefully than, for example, the quieter moments were stapled into Nailed or “Lord of Character” (if anybody cares about graceful integration in those wonderfully fierce contexts). In sum, Incarnation is another first-rate Cecil Taylor creation.

~Walter Horn

Posted by walterhorn on March 25, 2004 5:53 AM
Comments

Brian Morton has just published a Taylor Primer in The Wire, and a controversial one at that. I was under the assumption that the Primers represented the "best of" the artist's discography, but Morton includes a number of albums merely to shoot them down in flames (the albums with Trane and Mary Lou Williams particularly, but also Into The Hot, which I've always liked) and omits altogether two major Taylor documents on Hat, "Brewing" and "Salty Swift". Anyone else read this yet?
Cecil and guitars - I only have his FMP Bailey duet. Anybody out there recommend another encounter on disc between CT and an electric guitarist? I know Stefan Dill was with Cecil for a time, but I don't think any recordings appeared to document that collaboration.

Posted by: dan warburton at March 25, 2004 9:47 PM

I'll check, but all I can think of in my house is this one and the Bailey.

What the hell's wrong with "Into the Hot"?! I love Taylor's contributions to that record!

BTW, was the Maneri/Taylor gig at the Library of Congress ever released on disc? I've always had a hankering to hear that. Mat thought it went really well.

Posted by: walto at March 26, 2004 4:15 AM

Walt, I like that line about "violently spinning broken propellers." Dan, who's on the cover of that Wire ish' with the Primer?

Far as I know there aren't any other discs w/ Cecil & guitar (other than INCARNATION and SHAKIN' THE GLASS), though Bruce Eisenbeil has played in some of his large ensembles which have been recorded.

That Taylor/Maneri concert hasn't been commercially released yet either, but innumerable fingers are crossed. I spoke to Mat about it several years ago & he told me that Cecil had him 'rehearsing' all day, right up until just prior to the performance. By that point he was on the verge of exhaustion and Taylor hardly seemed phased. Mat referred to it as easily one of the most grueling gigs of his career, but also among the most memorable.

Posted by: derek at March 26, 2004 6:31 AM

The new Wire has the guy from Ghost on the cover. Self-promotional note: I've got a piece in the "Bites" section on Pelican, an instrumental "post-metal" band I recommend to everybody here.

Posted by: Phil Freeman at March 26, 2004 7:21 AM

I´ve seen Cecil with Larry Coryell in a Jam session during Dizzy Gillespie´s Birthday
always celebrated at the Grande Parade du Jazz in Nice ... that s was George Wein s times and something like 1982 ( or 81 ) ... but as i was into Tal Farlow in these days i did not quite noticed that ... Lionel Hampton sat on drums at a point ....

the Pablo live with Mary Lou Williams duo and quartet is really great in find , is it now on CD ?

best
n

Posted by: Akchote Noel at March 29, 2004 6:10 AM

I also thought i was reading somewhere Blood Ulmer and Cecil made something in the mid 70 ´s and also it seems Joe Morris did work with Taylor ( or was it a workshop )
it may well also be that Joseph Dejean played with Taylor during Paris BYG times
Bisceglia should now that

best
n

Posted by: Akchote Noel at March 29, 2004 6:15 AM

and it seems there s also a Cecil Taylor Trio CD ( or few tracks ?) with Derek
probaly Oxley and Parker too

Posted by: Akchote Noel at March 29, 2004 6:20 AM

>Brian Morton has just published a Taylor Primer >in The Wire, and a controversial one at that.

You're telling me. When I saw it on the contents page I thought that at last I'd get a relatively striaghtforward guide to a musician I've always wanted to listen to but have always been confused with where to start. And by Brian Morton, who I may not always agree with but at least I know where he's coming from. After reading it I'm more confused than when I started.

Posted by: Alastair at March 31, 2004 7:07 AM

I was puzzled by some omissions: where was the duo album with Max Roach? And what about my favorite solo Taylor album, Air Above Mountains?

Posted by: Phil Freeman at March 31, 2004 9:38 AM

Yes - forgot about "Air.." I also think Brian's pretty hard on the album with Coltrane. OK so Dorham's out of his depth, but the collision between Trane's linearity and CT's verticality is absolutely fascinating. Maybe we just have a different idea about what constitutes a "good" album. Hesitations, mistakes, conflicts and even downright fuckups are often things I return to. Damn, if every album was as good as "Kind of Blue" or "Out to Lunch" it'd be a pretty dull world. I do have to say that the Mary Lou / CT outing presents me with irreconcilable differences.. but I wouldn't shoot it down.

Posted by: dan warburton at April 1, 2004 9:04 PM

as a US-based subscriber to the Wire, I hope to join this discussion in 2-3 weeks.

Posted by: Jon Abbey at April 1, 2004 11:03 PM

Wow, it takes that long for Wires to swim the Atlantic? I guess so - Alan Licht once told me he found one on a newsstand in Brooklyn a week before they it the usual outlets (don't know whose newsstand it was, but there are so many musicians in Brooklyn it probably belonged to a free improvisor!)
Well, we'll still be here in 3 weeks when you join in, Jon!
Meanwhile, I'm always a bit dubious about Primers.. with a discography as vast as CT's (I have barely half of it, maybe less) it's always a tough job choosing the highlights. But I do think those late 70s Hat albums should have been there.
Anyway, reservations or not, I wrote to Chris Bohn asking if he needs a Dolphy primer (one of the letters this month gave me the idea) - we'll see if anything comes of that. About time there was an AMM Primer too.

Posted by: dan warburton at April 2, 2004 5:22 AM

I've been trying to get him to let me do an avant-garde metal primer, covering Pain Killer, Gorguts, the Flying Luttenbachers, and several dozen other things. Might have to lean on him again soon.

Posted by: phil at April 2, 2004 7:52 AM

Europeans. . .does Morton copy & paste his thoughts like the Mingus primer? Don't you have anything fresh to add? 'Black Saint gets a crown,' 'Antibes is a cold shower' (what a travesty were a neophyte to avoid that monstrous recording). Try some fresh substance, Brian.

Posted by: Michael Schaumann at April 2, 2004 9:52 AM

Count me as another one who found the primer a bit odd, and I'm someone who doesn't have much Cecil, so was prepared to read it with some interest. However, they did put a little bit in goto: about londonimprov, so I'm a bit happier with the Wire this month than usual - I barely asked them to do it "how do I get a mention for this in goto:?" and there it was.

Posted by: Nat at April 2, 2004 11:28 AM

Nat, what's your secret? goto:bagatellen.

How is the primer laid out? Is it a list? Prose?

Posted by: al at April 2, 2004 12:37 PM

>How is the primer laid out? Is it a list? Prose?

Interpretive dance.

Posted by: Alastair at April 2, 2004 4:03 PM

My recollection was that the comment about the Antibes concert was intended positively.

I glanced at the Taylor primer on the newstand but didn't actually work through it given that I don't really need a primer on Taylor. But I should take a closer look.

Posted by: ND at April 2, 2004 7:51 PM

e-mailed the listings guy with some listings and put almost exactly the same sentence at the end of the e-mail. It may have been an attempt to make right for publishing the listings deadline as three weeks later than usualy in the January issue when it in fact had/has moved to two weeks earlier than usual.

Posted by: Nat at April 3, 2004 2:14 AM

A Luttenbachers Primer - yeah, I could go for that Phil. Weasel Walter is one of those cats (Hafler Trio was also, until recently) that The Wire tends to pass by, not knowing where to file him I suppose.
Heard the WW / Drumm / Lonberg-Holm one on Grob? Mighty, as John Peel used to say.

Posted by: dan warburton at April 3, 2004 10:20 PM

Nate, it's a quote from Delaunay, and the review is mildly positive, but I feel this date is one of the true exponents of black music in the 20th cen. This really might be #1 on my list, period.

Listen to Eric breathing and sweating atop the congregation at the conclusion of 'Folk Forms I.'

Posted by: Michael Schaumann at April 3, 2004 10:41 PM

I usually point Mingus neophytes to Antibes also, one of the first jazz discs to really blow me away. I love quite a few of his records, but have never deeply connected to Black Saint and the Sinner Lady, give me New Tijuana Moods anyday...

Posted by: Jon Abbey at April 3, 2004 11:07 PM

Amen, Jon.
Yes, Brian Morton's a big Black Saint fan - there's some superb stuff on there (the last ten minutes are amazing, even the weird editing), but I wonder what that album would have been like if Dolphy had been on it (no disrespect to Charlie Mariano..).
As we're bitching about those Primers, I agree with the bloke who wrote in to The Wire complaining about the absence of Changes One and Two in the Mingus Primer. The quintet with Walrath, Adams & Pullen had to be THE great Mingus group of the 1970s.

Posted by: dan warburton at April 4, 2004 9:06 AM

I'll quibble with Dan here. Whether the Changes band was the great Mingus group fo the 70s or not (not too much competition really though, at their best, I might prefer the Bobby Jones, Charles McPherson, Byard group), I always found those two albums too chilly for my taste. Some fine compositions, but something about them always struck me as too confined, too unrelaxed. And I've never been a Walrath fan. Better than the abysmal "Mingus Moves", but still...

fwiw, though I love the Black Saint sessions, I also might be hard-pressed to rank it in my top 10 or so Mingus dates. But then again, I'm a huge LMCHM fanatic, so WTFDIK?

Posted by: Brian at April 4, 2004 9:17 AM

I think THE great Mingus group of the 1970s is a compliment roughly akin to THE great Republican US president of the last twenty years. I don't think any of his work from then is as good as his best 10-15 records before that.

Posted by: Jon Abbey at April 4, 2004 9:33 AM

DOLPHY s Playing on Mingus Antibes is PURE BEAUTY YES Dan !


i d recommand too the 3 titles of Bud Powell / Johnny Griffin recorded in Paris just as Duet ... and Blakey s Messengers in Paris with Barney Wilen on alto as a special Guest .... in the same "vein"


best from far
n

Posted by: Akchote Noel at April 4, 2004 10:18 AM

Glad to see I'm not the only person who thinks that "Black Saint" isn't the greatest Mingus record. I probably listen to it least of all of his I own (I don't have any seventies recordings though).

Posted by: Alastair at April 4, 2004 3:27 PM

Very funny how a discussion on the last Cecil Taylor record to be issued turn on an evaluation of the merits of some Mingus records.
By the way, I don't like much Black Saint either and I'm a geat supporter of Antibes.
The two best Mingus, aniway, are still for me Ah Hum and the first Candid one.
And the best Dolphy I've ever heard is the incredible introduction of Stormy Weather on the second Candid where Mingus push Dolphy to his most lyrical limits.
As Cecil Taylor is concern, I've just listen to Incarnation and find it far inferior to much of the others FMP. I don't like Douglas at all and the only interesting thing on it for me, its the meeting with Cyrille again. A duet album between both of them could have been a winner

Posted by: LeMo at April 4, 2004 4:49 PM

Who would the great Republican President be, I wonder? Agree that "Mingus Moves" is a damp squib, but I still think "Changes One & Two" are essential records. It may depend on your tastes - I know George Adams isn't everyone's cup of tea, and to be sure Walrath isn't on the same level as Pullen and Adams (nor other Mingus trumpeters before)- but for my money "Sue's Changes" is a significant Mingus composition, and the instrumental version of "Sound of Love" absolutely delicious.

Posted by: dan warburton at April 4, 2004 10:05 PM

The great Republican president would be Abraham Lincoln. But that was when the GNP was the good party. A long time ago.

Now the template for GNP presidents is Reagan. They want to put him on some currency...by all rights it should be some denomination over $1 million...

I like Antibes best. For Taylor I enjoy Conquistador. Early work, but I think Dixon was a welcome foil.

Posted by: fister at April 5, 2004 3:04 AM

Apologies as I first brought up Mingus. Dan, I absolutely agree per 'Sue's Changes' but I also think that his 70s bands were not as earth-shattering as what came before (how can anyone fault him for not following the Atlantics or Candids?)

Gulp. . .I really think the definitive 'Sue's Changes' is off that Mingus Big Band 'Live in Time.'

LeMo or anyone. . .I just can't imagine Douglas in a Taylor grouping after hearing that embarassingly bad Persons recording a while back.

Posted by: Michael Schaumann at April 5, 2004 6:14 AM

I love the CHANGES records, but I do have to agree with Brian that LET MY CHILDREN HEAR MUSIC is probably Mingus' one masterpiece from the 1970's, Macero-ifications notwithstanding.

But [paraphrase of a paraphrase] then again, I'm a huge Bethlehem recordings (EAST COASTING, A MODERN JAZZ SYMPOSIUM...) and TIJUANA MOODS fanatic, so WTFDIK?

As far as Talyor goes, the recordings on INTO THE HOT are among his most significant, IMO.

Posted by: Joe Milazzo at April 5, 2004 6:54 AM

I don't know if Black Saint is my favorite Mingus record (that's probably The Clown, believe it or not), but it's certainly the one I play the most often. The big bass clarinet farts in the beginning always do it for me.

I'll probably pick up Incarnation at some point, but I need The Willisau Concert first, I think. I need more solo Taylor.

Posted by: phil at April 5, 2004 7:30 AM

I've gone back and forth on it over the years, but currently I also have a very high opinion of "Cumbia and Jazz Fusion". It has its faults but overall I like it a bunch.

Posted by: Brian at April 5, 2004 8:16 AM

Phil get that Intakt posthaste! I know my CT, and I would be hard-pressed to find a better sounding piano recording. He's playing an Imperial and you simply won't believe your ears.

. . .and to further clarify, by Morton 'copy & pasting,' I meant that he merely rehashed or reprinted what exists in the Penguin, itself. Surely things (i.e., personal appraisal, tastes, approaches to music you've come to know) change with age, in other words.

Posted by: Michael Schaumann at April 5, 2004 8:33 AM

Phil, that's a bass trombone. TBSATSL and MINGUSx5 would be waaaay up top on my Mingus list for many reasons, one of those being Charlie Mariano's defining moments, having never sounded better or more possessed by music, IMO. And then that would be a perfect example of how Mingus was able to shape his musicians to his compositions. I can't even talk about Dannie Richmond without getting giddy.

I love Antibes too, perhaps as much, but couldn't possibly compare it to the Impulse records. Different bands, different music.

Michael, when you get around to INCARNATION, let me know what you think of Franky. I think he's wonderful here.

Posted by: al at April 5, 2004 11:20 AM

I was happy that the Mingus primer touched on his interest in jazz and recitation but was surprised that the writer didn't mention at all "Scenes in the City".

I've always enjoyed how the piece moves through it's various "scenes" and it always seemed obvious to my ears that this piece had a measure of influence on the atmosphere of some of Zorn's early pieces: Godard and Spillane.

Posted by: andy at April 5, 2004 2:22 PM

LeMo: "By the way, I don't like much Black Saint either and I'm a geat supporter of Antibes.
...
And the best Dolphy I've ever heard is the incredible introduction of Stormy Weather"

Interesting. I like Black Saint a lot, but also the Stormy Weather (for Dolphy) a great deal. I remember listening to it a fair amount back when I was at university.

Posted by: mwanji at April 5, 2004 4:14 PM

Al, I'm on it, curious as hell to see how Franky fares on this one.

"I need more solo Taylor."

I just can't let this slip by. Phil, in no particulr order, and you may have some of these:

--"Silent Tongues" (7/2/74) (Arista/Freedom)

A popular choice, perhaps unmatched in portions, nonetheless essential.

--"Solo" (5/29/72) (Venus)

This is really sweaty, recorded at 2:30am in Tokyo. Not necessarily for even the seasoned solo CT fan, but ever so different than anything in this context, for reasons you could only infer/deduce upon listening. Weird.

--"Erzulie Maketh Scent" (7/16/88) (FMP)

Fucking spectacular. . .undervalued criminally, and fucking spectacular. Yes, the inevitable CT FMP box muddiness is ostensible, no matter. If you haven't already, do it.

--"The Tree of Life" (3/19/91) (FMP)

Sumptuous, very different effort. Plodding and quite personal, to my ears. I think this recording is an essential compendium to his early to mid 70s solo approaches.

--"Garden, Vol. 1 & 2" (11/16/81) (hatART)

I dropped some snaps to pick this incredible effort in mint vinyl at a local place. I guess one could peg this his most complete recital; eager fenestra and dark corners, all of it is addressed. . .worth the search in its original format (the packaging makes up some of the price, but don't bother w/the verse).

"For Olim" (4/9/86) (Soul Note)

I picked this up a while back in college and always thought it a very mature effort, for whatever reason. The Master takes his time, but don't let that lead you to believe this is a minimal attack. . .think of the brevity incident to staccato. By the way, in my opinion his best, most tenebrous but quiet codas are involved here.

"Iwontunwonsi" (2/8/86) (Sound Hills)

Always I'm curious to hear blokes' opinion on this one from the moribund Sweet Basil. I don't know if this room had the best acoustic environment for Cecil. The attack is amazingly thorough throughout. . .sit down with this one. I'd say middle of the road but again, one of the unique ones, depending on what kind of night you like Taylor.

And then there's "Indent" and you siad you already had "Air Above Mountains," which Nathaniel Mackey screamed at me was his best solo performance. Hell, that third solo selection off the terminally unhip "Momentum Space" is just about as moving as anything, so enjoy the journey.

Posted by: Michael Schaumann at April 5, 2004 5:50 PM

. . .that's the fourth selection off the terminally unhip "Momentum Space," by the way, and this is another recent example of Taylor recorded perfectly, way out in front. It sounds like a Steinway, I could be wrong.

Posted by: Michael Schaumann at April 5, 2004 6:32 PM

What's terminally unhip about Momentum Space? Granted, not all of it works--the long trio track near the end is clunky--but the opening trio track (where Elvin just plays time rather than striving to play free) is quite good, as are some of the solos & duos.

I remember once listening to _Black Saint &..._ & thinking it astonishingly powerful stuff. Just one listen: never really recaptured that impact on subsequent hearings. Antibes & Ah Um are the ones. -- The Changes discs are great too--"The I of Hurricane Sue" & "Sue's Changes", in particular, & I like the vocal version of the Ellington tribute too! Walrath's role on the discs is very second-fiddle--I think he only ever gets a real solo on his own tune ("Black Bats & Bean Poles" or whatever it's called) so I can't see why people would find his work on the disc much of a factor one way or the other.

Posted by: ND at April 5, 2004 9:27 PM

Nate you're right with me. The first four selections of "Momentum Space" are fantastic. It grows old fast after that, but the first trio cut (incredible interplay--when Dewey comes back in subsequent to Cecil's solo, wow), the Elvin solo (not stale by any stretch, and more E. African than anything, which is rather recondite), the Dewey/Elvin duo (Elvin fucking takes over about three minutes in) and the gentle Cecil solo are unforgettable. I've read a few reveiews of this completely deriding its quality. . .maybe due to the label/exposure, who knows.

Posted by: Michael Schaumann at April 5, 2004 10:03 PM

Thank you very much Michael for the succinct and fine CT solo piano primer - I'll have to do some shopping myself, it seems, for "Erzulie" which I don't have.
Nate's right, Jack Walrath had apparently only recently joined the Mingus group when Changes was recorded, and doesn't get much solo space (Black Bats & Poles being an exception - and a fine Walrath composition too). But there's no "I of Hurricane Sue" on either Changes album, Nate.

Posted by: dan warburton at April 5, 2004 10:15 PM

I've never understood the scorn heaped on Momentum Space either. I listen to it all the time, and like it quite a bit.

Thanks for the solo-rec list. I don't have any of those; the two solo discs I have are Air Above Mountains and Indent.

Posted by: phil at April 6, 2004 6:59 AM

Just grabbed the albums--yeah, getting mixed up ("The I..." is on Let My Children, isn't it...?). I'd been thinking about the pair of related compositions "Remember Rockefeller at Attica" & "Free Call Block F, 'tis Nazi U.S.A." (in fact they're so related that due to a screwup their titles got reversed); but also thinking about the enormous reading of "Orange Was the Color...." which serves as the centrepiece of the alubm in the way that "Sue's Changes" does on the other.

Posted by: nd at April 6, 2004 8:08 AM

Okay, I went out and bought The Willisau Concert over lunch and after one play, 4 out of 5 dentists agree: it's ass-rapingly great.

Posted by: phil at April 6, 2004 12:38 PM

I have, too, to make some shopping... I mean, I'll ordered some by the net as no shop in this entire country will have any of those (except "For Olim", that I've seen around, but... well, I'm not a great fan of it.)
Interesting comment Michael S. on Solo (Venus.) Because this one has always puzzled me with its extract of Indent (the composition not the record) among other thing for the shortest Cecil Taylor solo ever publish (less than thirty two minute.)
Nothing to add to your fine commentary, only to correct the date of the recording you gave: it's from 1973 not 72, recorded a month after Indent, so it makes it, chronologycaly, the second Cecil Taylor solo ever tape.

Posted by: LeMo at April 11, 2004 2:55 PM

Bought Incarnation yesterday with trade-in credit at Kim's. Haven't played it yet, as I have to review the new McCoy Tyner for Jazziz. How's that for a stylistic leap? (I also got Prophecy and Nuits De La Fondation Maeght; I'm giving Ayler another chance.)

Oh, and the Taylor/Maneri duo disc has finally been released, titled Algonquin, on Bridge. Got a copy the other week. Really solid stuff. Maneri is definitely a partner, not an accompanist, during the performance. Highly recommended.

Posted by: phil at June 9, 2004 11:44 AM

I agree entirely about "Algonquin," Phil: it's even better than I expected (& I expected a lot).

Posted by: walto at June 9, 2004 11:56 AM

Another set of thumbs pointed skyward for ALGONQUIN (and INCARNATION too for that matter). Phil, in ten words or less what’s your beef with Ayler?

Posted by: derek at June 9, 2004 12:36 PM

Excessive hype resulted in disappointment. Plus, hated his singsongy melodies.

Posted by: phil at June 9, 2004 2:15 PM

In that case Phil can I have your complimentary copy of the Revenant box when it comes out? hahaha

Posted by: dan warburton at June 10, 2004 7:20 AM

It's funny; I kinda want that thing. I mean, have you seen the track listing?

DISC ONE
Herbert Katz Quintet w/Albert Ayler:
June 19, 1962 in Helsinki, Finland
1. Sonnymoon for Two
2. Summertime
3. On Green Dolphin Street
Cecil Taylor Quartet w/Albert Ayler:
November 16 1962 in Copenhagen, Denmark
4. spoken intro
5. Four
Albert Ayler Trio
June 14, 1964 in New York City
6. untitled; ends with "Spirits"
7. Saints
8. Ghosts

DISC TWO
Albert Ayler Trio:
June 14 1964 in New York City
1. The Wizard
2. Children
3. Spirits
Albert Ayler Quartet:
September 3. 1964 in Copenhagen, Denmark
4. Spirits
5. Vibrations
6. untitled
7. Mothers
8. Children
9. Spirits
Burton Greene Quintet w/Albert Ayler:
Jan/Feb 1966 in New York City
10. Untitled

DISC THREE
Albert Ayler Quintet
April 16, 1966 in Cleveland, Ohio
1. spoken intro
2. Spirits Rejoice
3. D.C.
4. untitled
5. Our Prayer
6. spoken intro
7. untitled
8. Ghosts
Albert Ayler Quintet:
April 17, 1966 in Cleveland, Ohio
9. Spirits Rejoice
10. Medley:
Prophets - Ghosts - Spiritual Bells
11. Our Prayer

DISC FOUR
Albert Ayler Quintet:
April 17, 1966 in Cleveland, Ohio
1. untitled/Truth is Marching In
2. Spirits
3. Medley:
Zion Hill - Spirits - Spiritual Bells
4. untitled

DISC FIVE
Albert Ayler Quintet:
November 3. 1966 in Berlin, Germany
1. spoken intro
2. Ghosts/Bells
3. Truth is Marching In
4. Omega
5. Our Prayer
Albert Ayler Quintet:
November 8, 1966 in Rotterdam, The Netherlands
6. spoken intro
7. Truth is Marching In
8. Bells
9. Spirits Rejoice
10. Free Spiritual Musics Part IV

DISC SIX
Albert Ayler Quintet:
June 30/July 1, 1967 in Newport, Rhode Island
1. Truth is Marching In/Omega
2. Japan/Universal Indians
3. Our Prayer
Albert Ayler Quartet:
July 21, 1967 ("Coltrane Funeral") in New York City
4. Love Cry/Truth is Marching In/Our Prayer
Pharoah Sanders Ensemble w/Albert Ayler:
January 21, 1968 in New York City
5. Venus/Upper and Lower Egypt
Albert Ayler:
ca. late August, 1968 in New York area
6. untitled blues
7. untitled sermon
8. Thank God for Women
9. New Ghosts [demo fragments]

DISC SEVEN
Don Ayler Sextet w/Albert Ayler:
January 11. 1969 in New York City
1. Prophet John
2. Judge Ye Not
Albert Ayler Quartet:
July 28, 1970 in Villages Vacances Tourismew, St. Paul de Vence, France
3. Mothers/Children
4. untitled
5. untitled
6. untitled

I'd love to hear that Cecil and Pharoah stuff, and the track from Coltrane's funeral celebration. Too bad discs 8 and 9 are interviews; I think those should just have been transcribed into the accompanying book. A 7-CD box, even one from Revenant, would be substantially cheaper than a 9-CD one.

Posted by: phil at June 10, 2004 8:14 AM

Agree. Burton Greene on there, eh? Did you check out the interview I did with him on the PT site?

Posted by: dan warburton at June 10, 2004 9:25 PM

1) Algonquin is indeed pretty darn good to judge by two not-always-focussed listens.

2) I've no problem with the interview material on the Ayler set--as long as they ALSO provide a transcription. & ideally provide index markers on the CD in case you need to find a spot--nothing more annoying than an interview track that's 30 minutes long & you're trying to find one key quote....

Posted by: nd at June 10, 2004 11:33 PM


Post a comment










Remember personal info?




Please enter the letter "r" in the field below:

NOTE: there will be some lag after you hit the "submit" button, but not much. That lag is our badass spam deterrent software at work. It is not necessary to use the submit button more than once. Thank you.



.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................