
|
|
|
I readily admit it. I am fascinated by the so-called Tristano School of improvisers. In fact, you could even say Im obsessed with it. Theres the Tristano persona, nearly Messianic in its arrogance; the lyrical wisdom of the techniques, especially the translation of classic jazz solos into solfeggio; the precepts against heavily inflected rhythm accompaniment; the ground-breaking experiments in extreme dissonance and themeless improvisation; the emphasis on linear development and nearly perpetual reharmonization of a canon of American popular song standards, the sacred but re-interpretable texts of the Tristano School; the internecine breaches of loyalty, sometimes leading to actual ex-communications In short, beyond the wonders of the music the Tristano-ites have produced, there is that odd mixture of Protestant ethics and Catholic mysticism in the ideas that lend the music a portion of its unity. The result is that, as the musicians that studied with Lennie Tristano continue to be prolific, we can hear each new performance by them as yet another battle of wills between the Acolyte and the Demiurge.
Since the mid-1960s, you could say that Lee Konitz has gradually been extending his mastery over his alto sax into a mastery of his musical identity. Or: shortening the distance between his head and his heart. His famous album Motion, featuring Elvin Jones in an trio sans piano, can be heard as a definite repudiation of the most dogmatic of Tristanos principles. Then there is evolution of his alto sax tone, once so pretty in a somewhat arctic, Aeolian manner, now like the voice, dried, roughened, darkened, of a chain smoker. Where Konitz used mainly to glide down from the upper registers of his instruments range, he now slurs and keens up into them. Whatever the direction, however, never will Lee abandon melody. Listen to the rendition of If You Could See Me Now from this latest set of duets. I thought I had heard as many versions of this, one of my least favorite Tadd Dameron masterpieces, as I would ever want to hear (give me Sarah Vaughns Musicraft recording, please). But Konitz does truly work new variations on it, some outright ballsy in their inventiveness those slowly cascading figures almost reminiscent of the first bars from Fats Wallers Jitterbug Waltz others the product of the most subtle adjustments in phrasing and articulation. As many other reviewers have pointed out, Konitz largely purged his improvising of standard licks years ago. He now plays quite deliberately, looking hard for those choice notes, which may explain why some complain that he does not swing. But if you open yourself to Konitzs adventuresome-ness, you will find yourself rewarded richly and unusually. Alan Broadbent, Konitzs partner here, also impresses, sounding only faintly like the torchy pianist in Charlie Hadens Quartet West. In fact, Broadbent sounds as if he must have listened to Konitzs 1980 alto-piano duets with Gil Evans (Heroes and Anti-Heroes) in preparation for the gig. He still tends towards the florid in his own solos, but there are some breath-taking two-handed passages here that sound like a direct homage to Tristano. In fact, all of the compositions and there are true compositions; any musician who has attempted to play them will tell you that those pseudonymous, Tristano-ite contrafacts, even when the source material is very, very obvious, are NEVER merely functional blowing vehicles, nor have they been played to death here are taken at a relaxed pace, ballads and boppish exercises like Subconscious-Lee alike. As John Litweiler has pointed out, we may tend to think of Free jazz as a musical descendent of earlier styles of jazz, popular African-American musical forms like rhythm and blues, and Western classical music from the modern era, free beyond a shadow of a doubt by virtue of its musical DNA. But Konitz has long been in pursuit of a different kind of freedom, and a freedom not necessarily equivalent with liberation: a freedom to use the entire extent of his musical experience in new ways, to make music that is, primarily, new to himself.
I guess I can forgive many listeners for treating Ted Brown as a simple stand-in for the sadly departed Warne Marsh, the second most well-known and perhaps the most accomplished in terms of the conclusions he drew from Tristano's premises of all of Tristanos associates. Indeed, Browns voice is a very Marsh-like extension of Lester Youngs. But Brown gets more of the Young plumminess in his tone than Marsh did, and, rhythmically, he departs significantly from the Marsh model. Perhaps hes simply not as agile as he was as a younger player hear him on Ronnie Balls Savoy session All About Ronnie (1956) but I believe its that, like Konitz, Brown has simply moved forward. As a matter of fact, hes more Konitz-like in his approach to rhythm, choppier than Marsh, the master of what I think of as internal rhythm, or the most minute sub-divisions of the best within a single phrase. Brown, after something of an extended absence from heavy musical activity (the second or third such sabbatical of his long career) has collaborated with Konitz on a number of recent occasions: on the RCA The Sound Of Surprise and another Steeplechase date, Dig-It, both from 1999. Whatever the case, Ted Brown is a player deserving of scrutiny on his own merits, which are considerable. Hear how he almost loses his no-slouches-allowed rhythm section (Harold Danko, who knows the Tristano tradition very well without being unduly beholden to it; Dennis Irwin; and Jeff Hirshfield) on Yesterdays as he investigates and copes with the consequences of his opening phrases. Or listen to how he handles the convolutions of his own Little Quail (based on the progressions of Ill Remember April), seemingly playing several new melodies simultaneously in the manner of a Bach fugue. If one can lodge a complaint against this recording, its that Brown himself sometimes disappears into the mix, which is a little flat quintessentially DDD anyway. Of course, a certain amount of timbral translucency and attention to nuance is part of this aesthetic. Listening to Brown, who retains the same kind of allegiance to swing era tenor sax verities as, say, Bill Perkins, most obviously on a gorgeous, nearly shockingly original interpretation of Willow Weep For Me, you can hear how musicians of an otherwise completely different cast, such as Joe Henderson and Anthony Braxton, have been impressed and, I suspect, moved enough to want to incorporate aspects of the Tristano approach into their own music. With each new recording, Ted Brown is completing that circle that Pres traced all those years ago; there are moments on Preservation during which the tenor saxophonist really does achieve that elusive Pres eloquence without resorting to imitations of the man. Its as if Brown is acting out, in his very personal manner, that age-old wonderment at why the path to profound simplicity almost always and inexorably leads through the most arduous forms of complexity.
If you care at all about that last question, these two releases are easily recommended. They may not be two of the most electrifying recordings youll hear this year, but they are, without question, two of the most substantial, and two of the most faithful to the creative spirit in all its mania, its intractability, and its essential generosity.
Posted by joe on August 22, 2003 6:58 AMNice review, Joe. Incidentally, do you agree with the common description of Tristano-school music as "cerebral"--or do you think that misses a key aspect, or...what?
Posted by: Walto at August 23, 2003 10:57 AMWell, one wouldn't confuse Konitz's readings of "If You Could See Me Now" or "Easy Living" with heart-on-sleeve balladry, that's for sure....but that's not quite answering your question....
Posted by: Nate Dorward at August 23, 2003 10:09 PMWalt -- if I could remove the negative connotations of "cerebral", I'd be more inclined to use that description. But to me use of that adjective poses too much in the way of a dialectic -- being brainy instead of being emotionally intense. And I think / feel that's something of a false distinction in general. To really focus on something with a great amount of mental energy or conceptual attention still involves one's emotional "being", just because that involves commitment. As Nate says, you don't go to Konitz or Warne Marsh or Tristano himself -- however moving the famous "Requiem" is, and it is, IMO -- for "heart-on-the-sleeve" expressiveness. Maybe its a case of inappropriate expectations on the part of some listeners. I would say the Tristano school approach is emotional, just never condescendingly so.
That said, there's certainly a lot of "technique" in Tristano's music; one listen to THE NEW TRISTANO on Atlantic is enough to convince anyone of that. But I also believe the music is more intuitive in terms of the process by which it's made that its generally given credit for being. I would cite Tristano having his pupils "sing" Pres and Bird solos as as evidence of this... Warne Marsh, though -- he probably took the implications of the Tristano School as far in pure intellectual terms as anyone ever did. But even in the 80's, as he returned to more regular recording activity, you could hear how his style had become ever so slightly less-forbidding. The Criss Cross date STAR HIGHS is a great example, as he's playing with musicians -- Hank Jones, Jiri Mraz, and Mel Lewis -- who throw a lot of bebop accompaniment at him. His responses are fascinating. The BALLAD ALBUM for the same label is equally interesting, just becuase a ballad session is not what one would expect from Marsh, who one friend of mind has called "THE tenor geek's tenor geek". I'm still thinking over the implications of that characterization, but I think it speaks to what I was trying to describe above, which is that committment, knowing so much only to the end of knowing even more, the apparent absence of overt emotion as a sure indicator of its presence.
Posted by: Joe Milazzo at August 24, 2003 9:25 AMFurther examples of Joe’s points on later Marsh can be found in his MEETINGS with Pete Christlieb captured by the Criss Cross label. Pete’s a very brawny, extroverted player and he brings out Marsh’s combative side in often congenial ways. Far from being an overly ‘cool’ tenor tandem they kick up quite a few sparks, especially against the pianoless rhythm section.
Posted by: derek at August 25, 2003 6:13 AM.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................