
Keith Rowe/John Tilbury
Duos for Doris
Erstwhile
I should begin, I suppose, with a few caveats. One, I’m a good friend of Jon Abbey, the owner/producer of Erstwhile Records and was fortunate enough to be in attendance with him at this session. Two, I’ve gotten to know Keith Rowe quite well over the last few years and am currently working closely with him on his biography. For that matter, though I had only met Tilbury fleetingly prior to this date, I came to like him very much personally and recently published a profile of him for WIRE, generating a tiny swirl of controversy.
Despite having known each other since the mid 60s and having been together in AMM since 1981, this is the first time the two had performed, much less recorded, as a duo (“Except”, as Keith mischievously remarked, “when Eddie stops playing.”) The event almost didn’t occur. Three days prior to the recording, Tilbury’s 95-year old mother, Doris, had a stroke. She died the next evening and Tilbury, understanding the lengths that had been gone to arrange the date, originally scheduled for two days, agreed (insisted, in fact) to come down from England to France for a single day of recording. This was accomplished in the same Vand’oeuvre theater, and with the same rented piano, that AMM had recorded ‘Fine’ two years before. At dinner the evening before the session, Tilbury asked Rowe if he had any ideas for the next day. Keith replied no, that he thought when John touched the piano he’d actually be using, the ideas would flow. At the session, aside from the two participants and the recording engineer, Jon and I were the only ones at hand; a very special day.
They created five pieces over the course of about three hours of playing, three of which were selected for this two-disc set. Tilbury warmed up by playing some Chopin, a little Schoenberg (a quote from which he interjected into the proceedings, much to Rowe’s amusement, in one of the improvisations not used for the final release) and a few English folk songs. The first piece on ‘Duos for Doris’, was also the first performed, a 70-minute construction of immense range and depth. Tilbury begins by rubbing a drumstick on the brass inner frame of the piano, treating it as purely percussion for the first six or seven minutes. Rowe, as has been more and more the case in recent years, is very much content to provide a “canvas” for his collaborator’s activity (though not necessarily a featureless one by any means), positioning his music as an element as integral as it might be unnoticed. He arranges laminae of drone-like sounds, with low, middle and high tones of varying and complementary textures. The swelling nature of these drones creates a highly dramatic sense of anticipation, one deeply rewarded when Tilbury finally enters from the keyboard with several low, pulsing chords. The release that occurs about fifteen minutes in, when the improvisation seems to acquire a life of its own, is one of several extraordinary moments to be found here. The music is redolent with emotion, giving lie to the charges of aridity and stoicism often leveled at musicians such as these. Granted, knowledge of the immediate and tragic events surrounding Tilbury’s personal life may have played into my perceptions, but it seemed (and does still seem) clear the emotional depths he plumbed. Some of his playing will be recognizable in general type by listeners familiar with his work in AMM, other aspects find him exploring entirely new territory (a judgment rendered not only by myself, but Rowe as well). The piece quiets down noticeably for fifteen or so minutes, remaining fascinating in a rustling, chittering way, before building to great intensity at about the 40-minute mark. In fact, the volume level rises enough, Tilbury pounding the keyboard with fury, so that some distortion sets in for a minute, although nothing that detracts from the force of the music. He builds to it with piercing chords, struck in a slow but nearly regular pattern that generate a huge amount of psychic pressure, accompanied by screeching metallicisms from Rowe, before the inevitable explosion. A series of funereal chords from Tilbury lead to contrastingly bright, Feldman-esque arpeggios, ushering in a kind of entropic process, the two musicians scraping and plucking in a dark, cavernous space for quite some time, almost to the point of a-musical activity. But in the last few minutes, Tilbury finds an amazingly delicate, single note “melody”, more like some faint, ghostly chorale, with which he brings the piece to a close over the poignant, Rowe-generated sounds of a distant propeller plane and what briefly sounds for all the world like an EKG monitor. Here, as everywhere else on this release, Tilbury’s incredible sense of touch and of pure note placement is beautifully apparent; always fluid, always the slightest bit off the cadence.
This second piece begins with the sound of birds over a faded, swing-era jazz recording. Tilbury quickly emulates the birdsong, trilling in the upper register. Rowe utilizes the radio more often on this track than elsewhere, though it rarely appears with clarity, instead appearing buried under distortion and static. Tilbury has placed nails, dowels and metallic balls on his strings, generating gamelan-like sounds from his keyboard when he’s not attacking the piano’s body with drumstick or fist. Rowe is operating at least four or five levels of sound here but all occupying such distinct zones that it’s difficult to comprehend them at the same time; different listenings almost necessarily cause one to concentrate on different aspects. Here as elsewhere, especially in the album’s closing moments, Rowe employs a tactic that might be initially irritating but, I think, serves a meta-purpose: when things get a little too beautiful, a bit too smooth, he will cause some rude noise to erupt. The crinkling of a scrub pad on the guitar strings or the harsh buzz of one of his many small fans will interrupt the sonic bliss, reminding the listener of the real world, one in which any thoughts of a peaceful heaven might be as ultimately meaningless as they are understandably desirable. There’s some remarkably anguished playing by both musicians about 20 minutes in, Tilbury eliciting frantic sounding yelps and Rowe ripping brutal, strangled roars from his machine. Eventually, a deep, throbbing drone develops. When it gradually peaks and begins to dissipate, Rowe conjures up a surprisingly (for him) rhythmic little motif, a casual thump accompanied by a metallic swish, boom-shee-boom, a beguiling nubbin that jauntily carries the next several minutes of the improvisation. This gets subsumed beneath a billowing hum as the music enters a cloudlike steady-state feel for a while, Tilbury casting about as though swimming through darkness, seeking elusive shards of light. Toward the end, Tilbury floats to the depths of the keyboard, phrasing the dark chords with more a sense of acceptance than surrender.
The final piece, in some ways the most moving, is in two distinct parts, each of equal length. Tilbury plays two high notes off a chord that sounds almost as though lifted from a processional while Rowe maintains a steady white noise pattern that feels subtly ominous. There’s very much a dark and light sensation here, the piano striving to remain optimistic, even rosy, the electronics steadfastly insisting that there is no way out, threatening each dreamy Feldman-esque arpeggio with a deluge of feedback. After a brief pause, Tilbury stands and begins to stroke one of the piano strings between his fingers, eliciting an extraordinary ghostly tone. One by one, he fashions a simple, lovely melody with these coaxings, just on the edge of audibility. Ever so subtly, he transfers this ethereal song to the upper reaches of the keyboard, a single note threnody heartbreaking in its purity. It’s difficult to imagine any other companion not letting this hymn stand on its own and gleam but Rowe just will not allow this illusion to remain untouched by reality. He scrapes and rubs his devices, quietly enough not to totally interfere, but with enough presence to make his point. It’s a tough lesson, and one that many listeners may actually object to, but that’s one of Rowe’s great strengths: no easy answers.
“Duos for Doris” captures two musicians of immense intelligence, probity and aesthetic rigor at heights arguably unscaled by either. It’s as powerful a performance as I’ve ever heard.
Brian Olewnick
Posted by on April 30, 2003 6:16 PMnice review, Brian. one point you touch on obliquely is that Rowe is very conscious of whether he's playing for an audience or making a record (this would be an example of the latter, as you and I don't exactly constitute an audience). I'm seeing this duo in London Saturday night, and I'll be very curious to contrast the show with the CDs (I'm guessing anyone reading this will have the same opportunity within the year, as most Freedom of the City shows seem to be released on Matchless or Emanem).
anyway, I think you and I are in agreement that this is our new favorite Erstwhile, superseding Weather Sky. Toshi and Keith get another chance to raise the bar next year, though. :)
Posted by: Jon at May 1, 2003 8:38 AMNice review. Even nicer album!
I was very taken by the gongy/chimey stuff on the second disc. Extremely beautiful sonorities. I take it that's the Tilbury gamelan stuff you were talking about?
While it's not my favorite Erstwhile recording (partly because of its length and partly because in a couple of brief sections Tilbury's playing is, I suppose you could say, not quite Feldmany enough for me), I can't deny that it has sections that exceed all other Ersts I've heard (& pretty much everything else too) for sheer sonic gorgeosity.
I was just listening again (for the nth time) and remembered something I've left out in recent discussions about this recording (though I think I recounted it in my initial post about the session on the eai-group back in January). It's a small thing but...during the last couple of minutes of the third track, "Oxleay", after dissolving that lovely single note melody into near-nothing, Tilbury (it seemed to me at the time) still wanted to hang onto the aura of what was just played. So he inverted his hands and very, very lightly stroked the keyboard with his fingernails, depressing the keys probably about a quarter of an inch, not enough to cause hammer to strike string, but enough to create, just above the threshhold of audibility, a whispery clicking. You can *just* barely hear this in the recording, I think. It was an amazing moment....presque rien.
Posted by: Brian at May 14, 2003 5:36 PMWhat about slight tilts of the head at just the perfect moment? Any of those?
:>}
Posted by: walto at May 15, 2003 5:15 AMAh, those, unfortunately for the rest of you, are the sole provenance of those fortunate enough to be in attendance at the event. And there were LOTS of 'em!
Posted by: at May 15, 2003 5:28 AMAGGHH. You're absolutely killing me, man!
Posted by: Walto at May 15, 2003 10:07 AMA propos of nothing: thought I'd mention that the schedule for Total Writing London (despite the title, it's mix of music and poetry programming) includes a public conversation with John Tilbury conducted by Harry Gilonis. See the promotional material I bumped onto the Jazz Corner website (www.jazzcornertalk.com) in the Festivals 2003 forum. I imagine (given recent _Wire_-related exchanges) that the discussion might be quite lively......
Posted by: Nate Dorward at May 15, 2003 11:49 AMNate. Thanks for posting that at JC, I'll try to make some of it. Do you know anything about Harry Gilonis?
Posted by: Nathaniel Catchpole at May 15, 2003 12:19 PMHarry? Yes, he's a friend--a poet/critic/generally knowledgable person who's like many in the poetry scene (Ken Edwards, Peter Riley, Ben Watson....) also much involved with the improv scene. His especial interest seems to be UK concrete & minimalist poetry: Ian Hamilton Finlay & Thomas A Clark, in particular. He edited for Allen Fisher's Spanner a very good festschrift for Howard Skempton, the composer (whose piano works have been recorded by Tilbury: _Well Well Cornelius_). His companion Elizabeth James works for the V&A & was one of the people behind Ben Watson's famed/notorious/overhyped/underrated/confusing MERZ NITE (I'm boiling down some very conflicting reports here....).
Posted by: Nate Dorward at May 15, 2003 12:42 PMSounds interesting, although I hope he's not a carbon copy of Ben Watson. I'll try to make that, would be interested to see what Tilbury has to say in more depth.
Posted by: Nathaniel Catchpole at May 15, 2003 1:32 PMOh, well, I have a soft spot for Ben though I know he infuriates just about everyone: I think his hit/miss ratio is better than many blander & more cautious critics (though when he misses it's by a mile). But Harry's only similarity to Ben is that they both write poetry & both are passionately opinionated.
Posted by: Nate Dorward at May 15, 2003 2:06 PMA belated footnote: here's my writeup of the Tilbury discussion:
Harry Gilonis curated a public discussion with pianist John Tilbury, occasioned by Tilbury’s decision to cease performing in the USA in response to the vicious neo-imperialism of Bush’s USA, and by the fallout from making this decision public. (Brian Olewnick wrote a feature on Tilbury for The Wire, dealing with both his political views and current musical activities; the magazine edited out much of the political content, touching off an angry letter to the editor from Tilbury and subsequent debates in its pages and elsewhere.) Tilbury eloquently and cogently made his main point: a performance within the USA, even if it included “protest music” or the like, would merely be coopted as a testament to America’s tolerance for freedom of expression. Tilbury’s argument is a strong one, but I’m puzzled by his fondness for citing with a measure of approval arguments that run counter to his own practice: he returned several times to Cornelius Cardew’s statement that a group of workers singing the Internationale was a musical event far more aesthetically complex and satisfying than the entire musical output of the avant-garde. Tilbury acknowledged when I asked that he’d no plans to drop his current musical practice and take up musical agitprop as a vocation, so I take it he does not agree with Cardew, but he failed to spell out explicitly why he disagreed. Instead he spoke, hesitantly and movingly, of how his music’s political spirit is in its retaining “this impossible, ridiculous idea of Utopia”, which chimes in with the Frankfurt-School cast of Gilonis’s own comments during the evening. If the discussion was inconclusive, especially in Gilonis’ attempts to draw it out into a debate on what those in the arts can do in “difficult times” (Gilonis citing Hölderlin), it was nonetheless an honest and necessary attempt at stocktaking.
The whole festival review is up online in the September issue of Paris Transatlantic (www.paristransatlantic.com).
Posted by: Nate Dorward at September 1, 2003 8:29 PMBecause Nate's review of this disc (for THE SQUID'S EAR) makes specific reference back to Brian's above, I feel a link is appropriate.
Interesting reading on their own merits, they make for especially compelling in each other's company.
Posted by: Joe Milazzo at October 10, 2003 9:52 AMJoe--thanks for the post: didn't put the link here myself because I didn't wanna toot my own horn too much. I should make clear by the way that the reason why the piece cites three different pieces of writing online without providing a hyperlink is that the Squid ridiculously insisted on deleting the references. Very annoying as I'd originally written it intending the reader go check out (1) Brian's piece (2) Rowe's piece (3) my summary of Tilbury's talk at Total Writing London.
Posted by: nate at October 11, 2003 10:18 PMHi Brian, I am just looking for relatives. My father is Leonard Olewnick, brother of John,William, Irene, Ann, Aileen, and Mary. Was wondering if you are a cousin??
Posted by: Lisa Olewnick at December 6, 2003 11:48 PMFor the benefit of the millions of posters concerned, I responded to Lisa privately. No, I don't think were related, despite the blessed rarity of the name.
Posted by: Brian at December 7, 2003 7:20 AMDid you at least ask her out?
Posted by: Walto at December 7, 2003 10:25 AM.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................