

Europe has long emanated status as an environment more receptive to and enamored of jazz than the States. Evidence is everywhere, from the periodic exoduses of American musicians over the decades, to healthy government-subsidized scenes in various countries, to the recent influx of labels that capitalize on the comparatively lax nature of European commercial copyright laws. It’s that last category I’d like to elaborate on in this post, having been following the activities of a handful of such companies, sometimes with interest, sometimes with concern for the past few years.
Imprints like Classics, which specializes in the systematic excavation of catalogs of swing and bop pioneers and more recently Lonehill, which doesn’t appear to have much in the way of constraints in what it releases, other than a preference for pre-1970 jazz, are probably well known to readers. Disconforme’s province is later swing through hardbop. JSP and Proper have cornered the market on cheap box set samplers of a single artists and sprawling genre overviews. The reissue and center sale sections of Cadence Magazine are often dominated by product from several of these European-based labels. Given the publication’s long-standing stewardship of independent artists/labels and a readiness to confront corruption in the industry, the embrace of what, at best, seems “gray market” merchandise seems strange. Looking closer, Cadence’s readership extends to the European community where labels’ activities are presumably legal. In light of this reality, coverage of the titles makes more sense.
At first, I assumed the guiding parameter on such products was grudging respect for a (seemingly arbitrary) European statute dictating a 50-year buffer on any attempts to market U.S. copyright-protected music. That no longer seems the case, as the Lonehill folks have expeditiously reissued material well within the temporal borders of that no-fly zone. I also received a much-needed education from a reader in the pages of Cadence, calling into question my claim of the Classics label’s diligence in securing rights to the music sold under their name.
U.S. jazz reissue bellwethers like Blue Note and Fantasy (now Concord) have presumably absorbed the brunt of the sales hit. When I was first delving into jazz in the mid-1980s, the storied vaults of these companies were the recipients of much conjecture and downright desire. Repeatedly perusing a copy of Cuscuna and Ruppli’s The Blue Note Label: A Discography (now largely duplicated online) in a grad school music library in the early 90s, my mind reeled at the aural possibilities of unissued sessions contained therein. The Blue Note vaults were a place of mystery and promise, their contents doled out in sometimes painfully piecemeal fashion. Reflecting back in the context of today’s reissue-rife market that sort of cultivated anticipation now seems nostalgic. Label’s like Disconforme and Proper have broken the locks and cracked the combinations. The reinforced steel doors have swung wide and ingress into the vaults is no longer circumscribed.
Smaller, more financially vulnerable imprints like Uptown are also in the crosshairs of these trans-Atlantic plagiarizers. Chuck Nessa has repeatedly gone on record lamenting the costly legal rigmarole he was forced to engage in with a European label that copied the meticulously mastered music on an Uptown Charles Mingus reissue and passed it off as its own. It’s hard to imagine how infuriating such an experience must have been. There’s also the persuasive point of musician’s royalties and the probable statistic that familial estates aren’t receiving dime one from these enterprising entities. Why send a check on to a widow, child or sibling when there’s no legal apparatus in place to mandate such an action?
Even with all the obvious evidence, the flipside of this argument is a compelling one too. First, there’s the reality that a significant slice of what these labels release is either not currently of commercial of interest to the American companies that hold the rights or slow to draw their notice. Lonehill, in particular, has brought into recirculation a startling body of 50s jazz that has yet to receive formal reissue on stateside shores. The packaging and documentation isn’t always the most diligent or accurate, but their multi-disc retrospectives on musicians like Illinois Jacquet, Gigi Gryce, Lennie Niehaus and French horn obscurist John Graas, are difficult to beat in terms of comprehensiveness and price. There’s also a wealth of single and double disc titles like the Earl Bostic two-fer that combines his hen’s-teeth soul jazz dates with Richard “Groove” Holmes and the Complete Gerry Mulligan Original Sextet Studio Master Takes (a set itself trumped by another set that also includes live material).
To the jazz junky, cheap and convenient access to this sort of stuff makes moral quandaries surrounding its provenance more difficult to reprove. I was just a record shop yesterday and discovered a pair of reissues on the Gambit label that instantly put this dilemma to the test. Also based in Spain (the Wilmington, DE for “gray market” reissues), Gambit’s licensing practices are unclear, but given their current catalog holdings (albums on labels as diverse as Verve, Contemporary, Columbia and United Artists) the Stateside legality of their program does seem suspect.
The two titles that caught my notice were a two-fer of Lee Konitz’s Very Cool and Tranquility, two highly sought after Verve sides that have yet to be reissued outside of expensive Japanese paper sleeve-pressings, and The Complete “Jazz Guitar” by Jim Hall, a set that purportedly presents the guitarist’s legendary debut on Pacific Jazz in unexpurgated form for the first time. I have an old CD release of the Hall album that includes edited versions of many of the tracks (solos by sidemen Carl Perkins and Red Mitchell were excised by producer Richard Bock) and had long been curious about the music in its earlier unabridged form. Also sweetening the pot on the Hall set, five bonus tracks featuring the guitarist in the company of various members of the Modern Jazz Quartet, including an eleven-minute duet with John Lewis from 1957. The Konitz is arguably even more tantalizing. The first session features his alto in the company of Trisantoites Don Ferrara, Sal Mosca and Peter Ind along with wildcard Shadow Wilson on drums. The second relies on a rhythm section comprised of Billy Bauer, Henry Grimes(!) and Dave Bailey, the latter two men Gerry Mulligan’s tandem of the time. Needless to say, I parted with the necessary ducats to bring both home, a needling conscience barely perceptible through the euphoria that ensued upon auditioning the sounds.
If the Dusty Groove inventory is any barometer of sales success, Gambit seems to be doing quite well. Over half its back catalog is out of stock on the site. Other “gray market” labels appear to be well in the black as well and not all of the income is financing nefarious designs. Sales of Lonehill and Disconforme product through Trem Azul has contributed to the financial solvency of the Clean Feed label. The proceeds, in turn, help Clean Feed release new releases by European and free jazz musicians both established and up-and-coming, a positive outcome by any free jazz fan’s estimation.
Still, the questions of legality and ethics persist. The presence of this sort of product across the retailer spectrum from online behemoths like Amazon.com to local brick & mortars like the one I visited yesterday seems to suggest a general acceptance of its viability as a lucrative earnings venture. People are selling it. People are buying it. But who’s being squeezed and abused in the bargain. These are vexing issues, ones I’m still pondering as the piquant strains of Konitz and his compatriots pipe through my stereo speakers.
Posted by derek on November 26, 2006 9:13 AMExcellent article, there is a store I frequent that features some of the titles you mention and begs the same ethical dilemma. Several years ago, before the most recent round of reissues, I faced the same problem trying to build a representative collection of Charlie Parker. At the time Discophone was the only label putting out packages of the complete master takes from Parker's work on Savoy and Dial, so that was where my money went, to a dodgy re-issue with weak liner notes and discographical information. Since then things have improved, but like you mention, several worthy artists are unissued except for the grey market. I keep hoping that Blue Note, Verve, et al. will release digital versions of OOP titles online either thru iTunes or a store of their own. This way they could eliminate the cost of a "physical" item while making their back catalog available in a legitimate way.
Posted by: Tim at November 27, 2006 7:53 AMGreat article examining an area that undoubtedly will expand due to how easy it is to disseminate intellectual property these days. It's a shame that America (for lack of a better term) is yet again behind the curve on its (her?) own musical treasures.
PB
Posted by: peter breslin at November 27, 2006 7:42 PMNot long ago, Gambit released the superb Ornette Coleman 2CD of Italian concerts from 1968 with twin-bassists Haden and Izenzon, plus Ed Blackwell.
For so long as the US "majors" (=idiots) refuse to get their heads out of their ... , and start thinking about music instead of money, music-lovers such as us will cheerfully support the bootleggers.
Posted by: Michael Lawrence at November 28, 2006 2:27 PMThanks for the props, Tim & Peter. This is a topic I’ve been thinking about for some time. Fwiw, I think Verve has a download-only Vault series that they’ve been offering for awhile. Haven’t stopped by their site in awhile to check out the current offerings. Ayler Records just got into that game too & the several titles I’ve heard so far are pretty great.
The construct of bootleggers as a “necessary evil” is one I’m complicit in through some of my purchases, but I wouldn’t necessarily characterize their motives as any more “pure” than the majors & it’s not a situation I’m cheerful about. They’re profit-driven ventures too, capitalizing on consumer motives/demand to turn a buck. The cheap/rushed packaging/annotations on many of the gray market releases proves this. The thing I can’t condone is the practice of ripping off pre-existing remasters (the Uptown example above). It’s a slippery slope, I realize, but that kind of pirate behavior just plain blows. At least when the majors release stuff (as patience-testing as their schedules may be to the chronic jazz junkie) they usually hire the requisite people to do it right.
Posted by: derek at November 28, 2006 3:13 PMI understand. But it remains a fact that none of my fifty or so Miles bootlegs (mostly 60's & 70's) was ever issued by Columbia. So the obvious question is "Why the heck not?". There simply isn't a good enough answer, for a music lover.
Posted by: Michael Lawrence at November 29, 2006 5:07 AMWow, Michael, that’s a lot of Mileage :) Moreover, it presciently brings up another ball of wax. I’m willing to wager that a large percentage of those 50 boots are currently available as essentially-gratis downloads through sites like Dime a Dozen, Oink’s Pink Palace, Soulseek, etc. The point being, these days, it’s pretty easy to circumvent commercial bootleggers altogether, at least when it comes to concert recordings in digital formats.
As far as Columbia not sinking capital into releasing those Miles boots in “legit” form, I’m pretty sure it boils down to perceived economic viability (ie. in the eyes of the bean counters, who but the mavens are going to shell out for double digit Miles sets). And there’s the question of comparative quality. In the rock realm, Pearl Jam and Fugazi proved that releasing a slew of shows doesn’t necessarily yield a bumper crop.
Posted by: derek at November 29, 2006 11:57 AMI honestly don't know whether some of these things are now available as internet downloads, Derek, I haven't looked. But in the 60's, people such as Miles or Coltrane and others agreed to have their concerts broadcast over European radio for a modest fee, in perfectly acceptable sound. Anyone with a tape-recorder could tape them off the radio, live or broadcast later. And we did - they were free - and Miles had been paid. Inevitably, sooner or later most of them appeared on LP or CD. The music was anywhere from good enough to top-class.
Let me give you an example: one day in Holland, I ran across a Miles CD called "His Greatest Concert Ever". Of course I thought, these people must be joking, with a title like that. I was totally wrong. Live in Antwerp, Belgium, 28 October 1967, 62 minutes, great sound, with Tony Williams taking the band by the scruff of the neck more dramatically than has ever been heard on any Columbia release. A seriously more gripping performance than anything officially released by that edition of the band.
So what is the music lover supposed to do? Tie himself up in hypocritical ethical knots, and ignore these things? I think not.
Posted by: Michael Lawrence at November 29, 2006 1:08 PMMichael, I think we’re basically on the same page with this stuff. I personally have no problem with bootleg shows being traded/circulated via download or other media. The artist(s) might not be getting paid, but it seems a relatively harmless activity as long as consumers refrain from reselling dubs of commercially-released music.
It’s the historical pay-to-listen aspect of the bootleg “industry” that rubs me the wrong way. Sue Mingus had the right idea when she started her jihad on commercial bootleggers of her late husband’s music. Unfortunately, her actual execution of the idea left a lot to be desired. Should person categorically ignore bootleg music? I don't think so. But neither should they be selling CDR copies of shows on the street corner to passerby for $15 a pop. Bottom line: it’s not theirs to *sell*.
Posted by: derek at November 29, 2006 5:12 PMAgreed Derek. For me, the bottom line is simple too. I want to hear good music, whatever the source.
Posted by: Michael Lawrence at November 29, 2006 10:59 PMHi- Interesting, that Ornette Coleman release from Gambit. I have a single LP of some of those Italian concerts that has all the marks of a bootleg itself. So now we are faced with *reissues* of bootlegs, which is kind of hilarious.
The Boy Scouts of America recently created a "Respect Copyrights" Merit Badge. That's kind of hilarious too.
PB
Posted by: peter breslin at December 8, 2006 7:10 AM.................................................. © 2003 - 2006 bagatellen ..................................................